|
Cross-layer
performance analysis
Traditional simulation methodologies
independently model the network and physical layer, based on the notion of
layering and information hiding protocol design paradigm proposed by the open
systems interconnect (OSI) model. When multiple layer simulations are required,
an abstraction of one layer is inserted into the other to provide the multiple
layer simulation. However, recent advances in wireless communication
technologies such as adaptive modulation and adaptive antenna algorithms demand
a cross-layer perspective to this problem. It is hence, often necessary to
examine the overall network architecture across multiple layers of the network
hierarchy. This is particularly true for a network that consists of a variety of
heterogeneous components. In such a scenario the design of an intelligent
overall architecture and protocols, seeking to improve performance on an
end-to-end basis is a challenging task.
In the line of ongoing research efforts,
the benefits and possible parametric characterization issues arising due to the
cross-layer integration of lower physical and higher network layers has been
investigated at MPRG.
Physical Layer Description:
A complete physical layer simulator based
on the IEEE 802.11a standard was used in our cross-layer simulations. OFDM was
selected as the modulation of choice to combat frequency selective fading and to
randomize the burst errors caused by a wideband fading channel. The key
parameters of the OFDM standard used in our physical layer simulation are
illustrated in Table 1.
Network Layer Description:
The system consists of a transmitter (base
station (B.S)) and arbitrary number of receivers (mobile station (M.S)).
Specifically, a cellular type of system is developed simulated with information
transfer taking place at the downlink. A number of uncoordinated users contend
for the available bandwidth. In response to which, the base-station (BS)
implements a greedy scheduling algorithm that makes channel assignments based on
the CSI.
|
Data Rate |
6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 54
Mbps |
|
Modulation |
BPSK, QPSK, 16-QAM |
|
Coding Rates |
1/2, 2/3, ¾ |
|
Number of Subcarriers |
52 |
|
Number of Pilot Tones |
4 |
|
OFDM Symbol Duration |
4
msec |
|
Subcarrier Spacing |
312.5 kHz |
|
Signal Bandwidth |
16.66 MHz |
|
Channel Spacing |
20MHz |
Table 1: Key Parameters for the
PHY OFDM

Figure 1: An adaptive modulation scheme
-
Baseline System
– I (Fixed rate channel encoder)
-
Full PHY-MAC
layer simulation, System - II (adaptive channel encoder with MAC interaction)
In the Baseline
System – I, a dynamic time division multiple access (DTDMA) based MAC layer is
implemented with a fixed rate channel encoder (BPSK modulation with R½
convolutional code). The schematic diagram of such a model is shown in Figure 2.
The entire system model will be described in more detail in the later part of
this report.
System – II with a
variable rate channel encoder and MAC interaction is shown in Figure 3. This
system implements a DTDMA based MAC layer along with a variable rate channel
encoder which is responsible for switching between one of three available
transmission modes depending on the channel condition, or more specifically, the
estimated BER value. As expected, the novel design of System – II would
outperform the above discussed Baseline system and is hence an obvious choice
for cross-layer design.

Figure 2: Baseline System–I: Fixed Rate Channel
Encoder

Figure 3: CSI Dependent MAC System–II: Adaptive Channel Encoder with MAC
Interaction

Figure 4: Snapshot of a network simulation
Figure 4. shows
the snapshot of a network simulation. The developed simulation tool facilitates
cross-layer optimization.

Figure 5: Snapshot of smart antenna system –
OPNET/Matlab co-simulation
|